Vickers 6 ton alternative upgrade. Export bestseller

Helpful Hints 27.06.2019
Helpful Hints

Official designation: Vickers Mk.E
Alternative designation: Vickers-Armstrong Mark E, Vickers 6 ton, VAE, Mk.E
Start of design: 1926
Date of construction of the first prototype: 1928
Stage of completion: in 1930-1939. 143 tanks built.

In the 1920s when the British tank-building industry was at the peak of its activity, a paradoxical situation arose - out of dozens of samples of promising armored vehicles, only a few of them were accepted into service with the British army. But even these "lucky ones" didn't go big mass production, and not at all because their tactical and technical characteristics did not meet current requirements or lagged behind their foreign counterparts - it was just the opposite - the British company Vickers became a "trendsetter" for some time. The reason was the reduction of the military budget and opportunistic considerations, which bred in the bowels of the War Office at regular intervals. Nevertheless, initiative developments took place in fairly significant quantities.

In 1927, a group of Vickers designers, including leading role played by John Carden and Vivian Loyd, proposed to create light tank to support the infantry. The official factory name of this machine was Vickers-Armstrong 6-Ton tank, but for export deliveries the designation was used Vickers-Armstrong Mark E, now reduced to VAE or Mk.E. The origin of the index "E" has no unambiguous interpretation. The vast majority of sources indicate that the letter "E" meant "Export". On the other hand, there is a version of "through indices", according to which the letter "E" comes next, after the letter "D".

Original technical solutions, used in this project, were subsequently actively used abroad for another 15 years. Suffice it to say that general scheme chassis with bogie suspension on leaf springs has found wide application on Czechoslovakian light and medium tanks from CKD-Praga and Skoda, as well as on Italian tanks from M11 / 39 to P26 / 40 inclusive (here it is worth mentioning that the model for these vehicles was all that or “vikkres 6-ton”).

With a great deal of originality, Cardin and Loyd approached the issue of weapons. Already at the initial design phase, it was predicted that both purely machine-gun "trenches cleaners" and "tank destroyers" with mixed cannon-machine gun weapons would be used in one formation. In this regard, three models were under development at once:

Mark E Alternative A (Mk.E Type A)- a two-tower version of the "trenches cleaner", the concept of which was inherited from the time of the 1st World War.

Mark E Alternative A (Mk.E Type B)- single-turret version with a cannon and a machine gun.

Mark E Alternative A (Mk.E Type C)- double-turret "tank-hunter" version with two 37-mm guns in the hull.

Only Type A and Type B were brought to the level of practical implementation. The “tank-hunter”, which in essence was an anti-tank version of the two-turret model, remained only in the project - a more detailed assessment showed that with the proposed layout in a not very spacious combat compartment, taking into account installation of 37-mm guns in the front and rear wall of the turret box, it will become even more cramped.

Chassis of the future Vickers tank-Armstrong Mark E was manufactured and tested in the same 1927. Anticipating that the new combat vehicle would not arouse much interest in the British military department, Cardin and Loyd immediately focused on export deliveries and did not fail. Regarding the tests of the first prototype of the Vickers-Armstrong Mark E, conducted in 1928, detailed information has not yet been found. Nevertheless, it is known that the double-turreted tank showed quite acceptable driving performance, and in terms of armor and armament it was not inferior to other Vickers products created under military contracts (remember at least the A3E1 and D3E1\D3E2 tanks). In the response of the British Evaluation Commission, approximately the same was indicated, and the allegedly insufficiently reliable design of the undercarriage served as the formal reason for the refusal. In fact, the War Office worked under the conditions of the approved concept, which did not provide for the presence of light tanks in the troops (according to British experts of that time, the "backbone" of the armored forces should have been heavy and medium tanks, as well as wedges). And the budget did not provide for a quantitative expansion of the armored forces. In addition, initiative developments were almost always considered something of a “second class” and officials from the ministry treated them with obvious disdain. Thus, the Vickers company was left alone with its light tank, which has now finally moved into the "export only" category.

And yet, the Vickers-Armstrong Mark E tanks were in service with the British army, although this happened in a very unexpected way. In 1939, the British government imposed a ban on the supply of weapons to Siam, whose behavior could not be called friendly. At that time, the second part of the Siamese order for Mk.E Type B tanks was in the process of being completed, four of which Vickers did not have time to ship.

For some time they did not find application, because in british system weapons, they did not fit in any way and were considered obsolete. However, after the defeat of the British Expeditionary Force in France in May 1940, it turned out that there were almost no combat-ready armored vehicles left in the mother country. In the conditions of the expected invasion, literally everything that could be used in combat conditions was taken from the "bins of the motherland". Naturally, all four Mk.E Type Bs were immediately put into running order and in June 1940 they were introduced into the 44th Royal Tank Regiment for training use. Subsequently, three "Vickers" were sent for scrap, but the fourth (assembled for Siam in April 1940) was decided to be left as a museum exhibit. Now this Mk.E Type B is on display at the Tank Museum in Bovington.

Structurally, all Mk.E tanks were almost identical and had a common layout: transmission in front, control compartment and fighting compartment in the middle part, engine compartment in the back. The main changes were made on the basis of contracts signed by foreign customers. As a rule, they indicated improvements in the power plant and a change in the composition of weapons.

Hull and turret configuration depended on a certain model and period of production of the tank, but the layout has always remained standard. In front of the hull housed the transmission, which occupied a rather impressive compartment. Behind it, in the middle part of the hull, a characteristic turret box was installed, which became a hallmark of all "6-ton Vickers". The crew was located inside the box: the driver's seat was always on the right side, but the commander's and loader's seats changed their position depending on the model. Now take a closer look at what variants of the Mk.E tank existed.

Mk.E Type A (prototype)- the first prototype had a turret box with flat frontal sheets, in the upper of which a double-leaf hatch was made with a viewing slot for the driver. The box was developed back and smoothly passed into the armor of the engine compartment, on the upper rear armor plate of which a silencer was attached. On the roof of the box, two cylindrical towers of the same shape were installed transversely with a small niche for a machine gun shifted to the right side. On top there was a hatch for boarding and disembarking from the tank. In the right tower was the place of the commander, in the left - the second machine gunner. The standard armament consisted of two 7.71-mm machine guns (of course, Vickers preferred to install products of its own manufacture, but customer requirements were also taken into account).

Mk.E Type A (serial)- Serial tanks supplied for export received a modernized hull. Since it was quite crowded inside the turret box, a small cabin for the driver with a double-leaf hatch and a viewing slot appeared in its front part. The massive armor of the engine compartment was dismantled, and a small armored box was installed instead. The silencer was now attached to the aft hull sheet. The design of the towers has not changed. The armor scheme was as follows: the forehead of the hull - 13 mm, the sides and stern of the hull - 10 mm, the towers - 10 mm, the roof and bottom - 5 mm each.

Mk.E Type B (first series)- tanks of this model, which were produced in 1931-1936. equipped with hulls that were identical to the Mk.E Type A, with the only difference being that a cutout was made in the roof of the turret box for only one turret in the form of a truncated cone. Part of the export tanks was equipped with an additional cylindrical air filter, mounted on the turret box on the rear-left.
The tower, in the roof of which a hatch was made, was installed on the roof of the turret box on the left side. Standard armament offered by Vickers included a 47 mm QF2 cannon and a 7.71 mm Vickers machine gun. The ammunition consisted of 49 shots of two types: high-explosive fragmentation (weighing 1.5 kg and initial speed 302 m / s) and armor-piercing (with an initial speed of 488 m / s). Maximum range firing was 5600 meters, and the rate of fire was up to 12 rounds per minute under the most favorable conditions. An armor-piercing projectile pierced vertically mounted armor plates up to 30 mm thick at a distance of 500 meters, which made the Mk.E Type B a very dangerous opponent for any production tank, with the possible exception of the FCM 2C, of ​​that period.

Mk.F- This model was a logical continuation of the work on the modernization of the Mk.E Type B. Work began in 1934, when the commercial department of Vickers contacted the Belgian purchasing commission, which was looking for a replacement for the obsolete Renault FT tanks. The light tanks Model 1934 and Mk.E Type B were offered to choose from. The first of them made the most positive impression, but the "6-ton Vickers" also had a number of positive qualities, in connection with which it was decided to purchase one tank for testing, but in an improved form.

The main problem of all tanks of the Mk.E type was an unreliable air cooling system, due to which the Armstrong-Siddeley "Puma" engine constantly overheated. Even the massive onboard air intakes did not help much. Since the “cure” of the power plant was not expected in the near future, instead of the Puma, an in-line Rolls-Royce “Phantom II” liquid-cooled engine with a power of 125 hp was installed. In parallel, I had to solve the issue of the layout of the engine compartment - the new engine had to be moved to the port side. In addition, to improve habitability in the fighting compartment, the driver's seat was moved to the starboard side, and the turret was moved back to the right. Unfortunately, the Mk.F tests did not bring the desired results and the Belgian army chose a more reliable option with the purchase of a license for the production of Model 1934 light tanks, also supplied by Vickers only for export.

Mk.E Type B (late series)- due to the fact that the "Belgian" model Mk.F did not find customers for itself, it was decided to borrow a modified hull with a turret box developed backwards. Again, depending on the importing country, the tower could be located either on the right (order for Finland) or on the left (order for Siam). Frontal armor of the hull was increased to 17.5 mm. They also changed the armor of the engine compartment, where the Puma engine, which was not very reliable, but well mastered in production, was installed.

A buyer for this model was found quite quickly - in 1936, the Finnish government approved the conclusion of a contract for the supply of modernized Mk.E Type B tanks, but with certain nuances. The problem was that the standard turret with the 47-mm QF2 gun did not suit the Finns at all, therefore, in order not to miss the last profitable order for obsolete equipment, Vickers decided to new round improving the combat qualities of the tank. The customer's orientation towards developments from Sweden played a more than positive role here - in December 1935, the Swedes completed the development of a turret for the Polish 7TP tank, in which a 37-mm cannon and a coaxial machine gun were installed. For ventilation of the tower, a slot was made along its perimeter. Both sides quickly found a common language and the Mk.E Type B tanks for Finland were also equipped with turrets of this type, which were distinguished by a rear niche for a radio station and a common mask for guns and a machine gun. By analogy with the Mk.F model, the turret was mounted on the right side with an offset to the rear.

The characteristics of the tower were as follows: diameter - 1320 mm, shoulder strap - 1170 mm, slope of the side armor plates - 10 °, thickness of the circular armor - 13.6 mm. A slot was made along the perimeter of the walls, which served for ventilation during firing. The internal layout was very organically done - with a rollback of the gun of the order of 200-230 mm (at any angle of elevation / deviation), the artilleryman could safely be directly opposite him. Observation devices included two episcopes mounted in cutouts on the roof of the tower, five prismatic mirror viewing devices and one triplex in the driver's shield.

Chassis tank, at the time of its appearance, was a very original configuration. It was possible to ensure smooth running in several ways, but the main one in the 1920s. was considered a method of using numerous road wheels. Of course, the indicator of "smoothness" increased, but in terms of manufacturability and operational reliability, it was a real nightmare. Cardin and Loyd went the other way, proposing the following scheme (applied to one side):

- front driving wheel;

- rear steering wheel;

- 8 supporting rollers blocked in pairs in 4 bogies, each pair of bogies had a single balancer with suspension on leaf springs;

— 4 supporting rollers;

- a small-link caterpillar of 102-103 steel tracks 230 mm wide and 229 mm pitch.

Thus, the balance between driving and performance was maintained at a very acceptable level. But it was more important - the scheme turned out to be very successful and served as the basis for many other tanks.

Power point. All Mk.E tanks were equipped with a 4-cylinder air-cooled gasoline engine Armstrong-Siddeley "Puma" with a working volume of 6667 cm3. There is no consensus in foreign sources regarding the power. Apparently, depending on the year of manufacture, different series of this engine could develop 80, 87 or 92 hp. The fuel supply was 182 liters.

During the operation of early models, insufficient engine cooling was detected, which led to numerous breakdowns. Engine builders did not make special efforts to solve this problem, and therefore the question of replacing the Puma engine with some other was repeatedly raised, as was later done on the Dragon Medium Mk.IV artillery tractor. One of the solutions was proposed by Vickers as part of the implementation of the Polish contract - massive air intakes with a front grille were installed on the sides in the rear of the superstructure. Cooling improved, but in general the problem could not be solved, and the air intakes were abandoned on the Polish versions of the Mk.E.

Transmission, located in the front of the hull, also remained identical for all Mk.E tanks and included the following components:

— multidisk main friction clutch of dry friction;

- drive shaft;

- manual transmission with 4 forward speeds and 1 reverse speed;

- side clutches;

- hand brake.

radio station was provided only on tanks of the late series Mk.E Type B, which were equipped with a turret with a stern niche. The Marconi model SB4a was offered as one of the options, but very few such radios were installed. The antenna was installed in the aft part of the hull. Since the radio equipment took up a lot of space, the ammunition for machine guns was reduced from 6000 to 4000 rounds.

Sources:
Luis Antezana "Los tanques en la Guerra del Chaco". Cima Editors 2010
Alejandro Quesada The Chaco War 1932-35: South America's Greatest Modern Conflict
Kapteeni P. Hovilainen: Tankkirykmentista Panssaripataljoonaan 1919 – 1949.
Vickers light tanks in the Gran Chaco War
Photos of Dutch armored vehicles
ILLUSTRATED MILITARY HISTORY SITE: Armored Vehicles in the Chaco War
tankfront.ru: Tanks in the Gran Chaco War
JAEGER PLATOON: VICKERS 6 TON AND T-26E TANKS
network54: Chinese Dragons
network54: Tanks at Chaco War
RAF vehicles in Iraq, 1938
The PIBWL military site: The Vickers 6-Ton Tank (Mark E)
Trench crossing device for vehicles (patent US 2012090 A)
Soldados del MundoTanque ligero Vickers 6-ton
Courage: VICKERS-FINNISH TANK © Aleksey Khlopotov (Gur Khan)
Material Blindado das nossas Forcas Armadas

PERFORMANCE AND TECHNICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF LIGHT TANKS
Vickers Mk.E Type A and Type B

COMBAT WEIGHT Vickers Mk.E Type A
1931
Vickers Mk.E Type B
1937
COMBAT WEIGHT 7200 kg 7300 kg
CREW, pers. 3
DIMENSIONS
Length, mm 4560
Width, mm 2140
Height, mm 2080 2160
Clearance, mm 380
WEAPONS two 7.71 mm Vickers machine guns in separate turrets one 47 mm cannon (QF2 3-pdr Gun) and one 7.71 mm Vickers machine gun in the turret
AMMUNITION 6000 rounds 49-50 armor-piercing and high-explosive fragmentation shells, 4000-6000 rounds
AIMING DEVICES optical sights telescopic sight
BOOKING forehead of the body (top) - 8 mm
hull forehead (bottom) - 12.7 mm
felling forehead - 5 mm
side of the hull - 12.7 mm
hull feed (top) - 8 mm

tower - 12.7 mm
gun mask - 12.7 mm
roof - 5 mm
bottom - 5 mm
hull forehead - 17.5 mm
felling forehead - 5 mm
side of the hull - 12.7 mm
hull feed (top) - 8 mm
hull feed (bottom) - 12.7 mm
tower - 12.7 mm
gun mask - 12.7 mm
roof - 5 mm
bottom - 5 mm
ENGINE Armstrong-Siddeley "Puma", petrol, 4-cylinder, 91.5 hp
TRANSMISSION mechanical type: single disc clutch, drum brakes, differential, manual transmission
CHASSIS (on one side) 8 road wheels interlocked in pairs (suspension on horizontal springs), 4 support rollers, front drive and rear guide wheels, small-section metal caterpillar with a track width of 230\290 mm
SPEED 35 km \ on the highway
POWER RESERVE 160 km (highway)
90 km (along the country road)
OBSTACLES TO OVERCOME
Climb angle, deg. 37°
Wall height, m 0,76
Ford depth, m 0,90
Ditch width, m 1,85
MEANS OF COMMUNICATION signal flags signal flags or Marconi radio station
Fighting vehicles of the world, 2014 No. 25 Transporter-tractor MT-LB

"VICKERS "6-TON"

"VICKERS "6-TON"

The history of mankind knows many examples when talented, gifted people or outstanding ideas and inventions were recognized all over the world, with the exception of their own homeland. It is amazing, but true - even the history of armored vehicles is replete with similar situations. One such example is the fate of the English tank, commonly known as the Vickers 6-ton tank.

Vickers Light Tank Mk. E mod. And in the courtyard of the Vickers-Armstrong Ltd. plant, 1930. Noteworthy are the water-cooled Vickers machine guns mounted in the turrets.

"Vickers 6-ton" was developed on an initiative basis in 1930 by Vickers-Armstrong Ltd. in three versions - single-turret, double-turret and in the variant of a fighter tank.

THREE OPTIONS

Single-turret version of the Vickers Mk. E mod. In was intended to solve the problems of fire support. The conical turret was placed on a turret box closer to the port side. Armament - 47 mm cannon and 7.7 mm machine gun in a twin mount.

Ammunition - 50 shots and 4000 rounds.

Double turret version of the Vickers Mk. E mod. And it was an infantry escort tank. It had a riveted box-section hull. The driver was located in front of it on the right. Two cylindrical towers were placed side by side on a turret box. Armament consisted of two 7.7 mm Vickers machine guns. Horizontal firing for each machine gun was 265 °. Ammunition - 6000 rounds, armor - 5-13 mm. Engine Armstrong Siddeley - 4-cylinder, carbureted, air-cooled with a capacity of 80 liters. With. Maximum speed - 35 km / h, cruising range -160 km, combat weight - 6.7 tons.

The third variant was designated Vickers Mk. E mod. C. By design, it was similar to the twin-turret version, but was additionally armed with two 37-mm anti-tank guns installed in the front and rear sheets of the turret box. The fighter tank was supposed to be produced only by special order.

None of the three options aroused the interest of the British military, since the vehicle did not fit into the classification of tanks adopted in the UK. The calculation of the company's management for export orders turned out to be correct.

TANKS FOR EXPORT

On May 28, 1930, the Soviet procurement commission, headed by I. A. Khalepsky, head of the newly created Directorate of Mechanization and Motorization of the Red Army, signed a contract with Vickers for the production of 15 Vickers Mk. E mod. A. The first tank was shipped to the customer on October 22, 1930, and the last on July 4, 1931. Soviet specialists also took part in the assembly of these tanks. Each combat vehicle purchased in England cost the Soviet Union 42,000 rubles (in 1931 prices). Having passed the tests, the tank was adopted by the Red Army, and after a number of changes were made to the design, its mass production was launched under the T-26 index. A start was made. November 20, 1930 Greece acquired two tanks: two- and one-turret. Since there was no new order, it can be assumed that the purchase was for informational purposes.

Vickers Light Tank Mk. E mod. A, made for Poland, 1932. The vehicle is armed with two Hotchkiss machine guns.

Vickers Light Tank Mk. E mod. In the army of Siam. 1930s.

The contract for the supply of tanks to Poland was concluded on September 16, 1931. In the period from June 1932 to November 1933, 38 units were manufactured and delivered: 22 double-turret and 16 single-turret. The double-turreted version differed from the standard English model in the shape of the towers and armament. In Poland, tanks were equipped with a special air intake casing. Single turret tanks were armed with 47 mm Vickers guns and 7.92 mm Browning wz. 30. The twin installation was located in a conical turret, shifted to the left side of the tank. On September 1, 1939, the Polish Army had two tank companies armed with Vickers. Each of them consisted of 16 combat vehicles (three platoons of five tanks and a company commander's tank). The first was formed at the Training Center for Tank Forces in Modlin for the Warsaw Motorized Armored Brigade, which was part of the Lublin Army, the second was part of the 10th Cavalry Brigade of the Krakow Army. Both companies took part in the battles with the Germans.

In October 1932, three machines - two single-turret and one double-turret - were ordered by Bolivia. These tanks were the only 6-ton Vickers on the Latin American continent and the first to take part in the hostilities. In the summer of 1932, war broke out between Bolivia and Paraguay, known as the Gran Chaco War. All three Bolivian Vickers participated in it. The double-turreted tank was captured by the Paraguayans and erected as a monument in the country's capital, Asuncion.

In February 1933, 10 vehicles of modification "B" were sent to the Kingdom of Siam (now Thailand). In addition, 26 anti-aircraft tanks were manufactured for this country, which were a “6-ton” chassis with a trough-shaped hull open on top. These machines were equipped with a 40-mm pom-pom anti-aircraft gun. In 1938, Siam ordered another 12 single-turreted tanks, but by September 1939 the company managed to ship only eight vehicles. The rest were requisitioned by the British government in connection with the outbreak of war and were used in the UK as training.

Twenty single-turret vehicles were purchased by China in 1934-1936. These tanks are appearance differed from the standard ones by the presence of a niche in the aft part of the tower - a radio station was installed in it. In 1938, eight single-turret Vickers were purchased by Bulgaria.

“6-ton” vehicles were not delivered to the USA, Japan and Italy, however, one twin-turret vehicle was sent to these countries for demonstration. According to unconfirmed reports, for some time one "Vickers" modification "A" was in Romania and Estonia for the same purpose.

The commanders of the Red Army inspect the wrecked Finnish tank "Vickers" Mk. E mod. B, armed with a 37 mm Bofors cannon. March 1940.

20 YEARS IN SERVICE

One Vickers Mk. E mod. In 1933, bought by Finland. The contract for the supply of a batch of tanks to Finland was concluded on July 20, 1937. From basic English version Mk. E mod. The Finnish sample was distinguished by the shape of the embrasure for the installation of a 37-mm Bofors gun. It was supposed to deliver 32 units to Finland: without weapons, means of communication and optical devices. However, before the start of World War II, only 26 cars were sent, the remaining six remained in England. Together with four "Siamese" vehicles, they were the only tanks of this type in service with the British army. Sixteen tanks in Finland received 37 mm French Puteaux SA18 cannons, dismantled from obsolete French Renault FT17 tanks, and 7.62 mm Lahti L-33/36 machine guns. Their characteristic external feature was a niche in the aft part of the tower, intended for the Marconi SB-4a radio station. The combat weight was 8.4 tons, the crew - three people. The remaining 10 tanks were armed with a 37 mm 37 psvk 36 (Bofors) cannon and a 7.62 mm L-33/36 machine gun in the turret, a 9 mm Suomi submachine gun in the front hull to the left of the driver. Crew - four people.

On the eve of the Winter War, the 3rd and 4th companies of the only Finnish tank battalion were armed with Vickers tanks. Combat vehicles of the 4th company on February 26, 1940 took part in the first for the Finnish army tank battle near Honkaniemi (Lebedevka). Finnish "Vickers" collided here with Soviet "Vickers" - T-26 tanks from the 112th tank battalion of the 35th easily tank brigade. In this battle, the Finns lost seven vehicles. The eighth tank was badly damaged, evacuated to the rear, but not restored. The Soviet side had no losses. Another skirmish with Soviet tanks took place on February 29 medium tank The T-28 fired at two Vickers, as a result of which one of the Finnish tanks burned down along with the crew.

After the Winter War, the vehicles remaining in service were re-armed with 45-mm cannons taken from wrecked Soviet T-26s, Suomi submachine guns were replaced by Soviet DT machine guns. After all these changes, the tanks received the designation T-26E. Externally, the Vickers modernized in this way was indeed very similar to the T-26 of the 1937 model, with the only difference being that the latter had a turret closer to the left side of the hull, while the T-26E had to the right. By the beginning of the Long War (this is how the period of participation of this country in World War II is called in Finland), the T-26Es were consolidated into the 3rd tank company, which was one of the first to start fighting against the Red Army on June 25, 1941. Combat vehicles of this type, like the captured Soviet T-26s, were quite effectively used by the Finns to directly support the infantry. By the summer of 1944, ten T-26Es were in service with the 1st and 2nd battalions of the tank brigade, which was part of the only Finnish tank division. A certain number of T-26Es were operated after the end of the war. On December 31, 1958, the Finnish army still had seven tanks of this type.

Finnish light tank T-26E in a combat position during street fighting in Vyborg on June 19, 1944. Judging by the radio station antenna, this is the platoon commander's tank. It is noteworthy that the Finnish tankers used Soviet-style tank helmets.

From the book Technique and weapons 2003 02 author

From the book Technique and weapons 2004 06 author Magazine "Technique and weapons"

From the book Artillery and mortars of the XX century author Ismagilov R. S.

Large-caliber machine gun "Vickers" Firm "Vickers" on the basis of its easel machine gun has developed a machine gun caliber 12.7 mm. known as "Vickers.50". The 12.7-mm cartridge was loaded with a bullet weighing 35.64 or 37.03 g. The first at a distance of 200 m pierced 15 mm nickel armor, at 400 m -

From the book Fighters of the First World War. Part 2 author Ivanov S. V.

203-mm howitzer Vickers Mk VI After the outbreak of World War I, Great Britain, like Russia, experienced an acute shortage of powerful siege weapons to storm well-fortified fortresses. Therefore, in 1916, mass production began hastily at the Vickers factories.

From the book Technique and weapons 2014 08 of the author

Vickers F.B.9 The aircraft was a continuation of the line of the first Vickers "pushers" (F.B.5 and F.B. 6), created back in 1913. The aircraft corresponded to the concept of a two-seat multi-purpose aircraft popular before the war, although it was intended primarily for the role of a fighter.

From the book Technique and weapons 2014 12 author Magazine "Technique and weapons"

Vickers F.B.12 The name of Cecil Bernard Redrup is little known even to historians. Redrup was one of the pioneers of British aviation, creating aircraft engines for which he received several patents in 1910-1914. First of all, he was engaged in the improvement of the so-called

From the book Fighting vehicles of the world, 2014 No. 25 Transporter-tractor MT-LB of the author

"Vickers 12-ton", aka "Medium" Semyon Fedoseev Despite the heated debate about the need for the existence of tank units after the First World War, in 1922 in the UK they nevertheless decided to keep the Tank Corps, created five years earlier. In October

From the author's book

Tank "Vickers" Mk II* British exposition. Museum of Armored Vehicles in Bovington These photos were provided by our regular reader Uwe Harnach from Switzerland. A detailed story about the history of the creation and use of 12 ton tanks

From the author's book

VICKERS "6-TON" The history of mankind knows many examples when talented, gifted people or outstanding ideas and inventions were recognized all over the world, with the exception of their own homeland. Amazing, but true - even the history of armored vehicles abounds

The end of the 20s turned out to be a rather gloomy time for English tank building in general and the companyvickers in particular. May 9, 1928 died chief designer Sir George Thomas Buckham Company. Around the same time, orders for new tanks begin to fade. New machines of the company -A1E1 Independent andA6 Medium Tank - were not the most successful. Meanwhile,vickers finally received the first experience in the supply of tanks for export by sellingMedium tank Mark. C to Japan. The next abroad (to Ireland) leftMedium tank Mark. D, yes andMedium Tank Mk II also interested foreign customers.

This prompted the company, which in 1927 merged with Sir W G Armstrong Whitworth & Company to form Vickers-Armstrongs Limited, to further work on creating purely export tanks. The result was a tank Vickers Mk.E- a machine that inscribed its creators and company in golden lettersvickers in general in the history of world tank building.

fresh blood

After the end of the First World War and the inevitable reduction armed forces British officers, deprived of the opportunity to build a further military career, decided their fate in different ways. Some of them tried their hand at the automotive industry. Among them was John Carden (John Valentine Carden), who rose to the rank of captain in the army. Even before the war, he was engaged in tiny cars, and after it he took up sports cars. However, he did not achieve much success in this field.

Another British Army captain, Vivian Graham Loyd, had the same passion. Two talented engineers met in 1923. Together they decided to leave the automotive industry, which by that time was overflowing with small firms, and switch to the production of military products.

Suspension unit designed by John Carden and widely used on Vickers tanks

Carden-Loyd was founded in 1925. Like Giffard Le Quesne Martel, another key figure in British tank design, Cardin and Loyd decided to try their luck with a single-seat wheeled-tracked tankette. Following the three experienced single tankettes they created, they were followed by the double Carden-Loyd Mk.IV / Mk.V.

The result of the work of talented designers was an epoch-making machine - the Carden-Loyd Mk.VI tankette, which sold a huge circulation of more than 450 copies for its time. The brainchild of Cardin and Loyd turned out to be a reference for such a class of combat vehicles as tankettes, and served as the basis for the creation of similar designs in a number of countries. Among other know-how, this vehicle was the first serial tank in which the transmission was located in the bow of the hull.


Prototype of a 6-ton Vickers tank with a Dorman engine

In addition to the construction of tankettes, Carden-Loyd was engaged in engineering. Since 1926, her close collaboration with Vickers begins. This cooperation proved to be extremely productive and mutually beneficial. The small firm acquired the patronage of the arms giant, and Vickers-Armstongs received at its disposal promising developments Cardin Loyd.

Of greatest interest was the caterpillar undercarriage, in the development of which John Carden achieved great success. He developed a balancing scheme with road wheels of a rather large diameter and leaf spring suspension. This scheme proved to be very successful when used on light tanks.

Cardin also developed another balancing suspension. It used a four-roller scheme (2 carts with 2 small-diameter road wheels each) with half-springs as an elastic element. Thanks to this scheme, a light tank received 8 road wheels on board, which was advisable for combat vehicles, which were mainly used not on roads, but on rough terrain.

The Cardin suspension turned out to be quite compact and easy to operate. Such a chassis, in which case, could be serviced by a mechanic of below average qualification. The smallest thing remained - to create a tank with such a chassis.

Small triplex

The development of a new light tank was complicated by the fact that the British army did not need it. At that time, the concept of British mechanized units meant the use of heavy tanks (A1E1 Independent) as breakthrough vehicles, which were supposed to support medium tanks with cannon-machine guns (Medium Tank Mk.I and Medium Tank Mk.II). The third "link" in this system were wedges (Carden-Loyd Mk.VI). Light infantry support tanks like the Renault FT simply had no place in this concept. The natural way out of the situation was to develop a tank for export.


The same base served as the basis for an artillery tractor

Despite the fact that the phrase "Carden-Loyd" is not in the name of the tank, which eventually came into being, it owes its creation to a large extent to this company. We are talking not only about the chassis, but also about the layout of the new machine. It was based on the layout of the Carden-Loyd Mk.VI tankette, while the engine moved from the fighting compartment to the rear.

As a power plant, it was decided to use an 80-horsepower Dorman water-cooled engine, which was widely used by various automobile companies. The designers placed the driver on the right in the direction of travel. In the original version, its hatch consisted of as many as five sections. The turret box of the tank could be dismantled if necessary.


Artillery tractor equipped with an Armstrong-Siddeley engine

The experimental tank, which was originally called the 6-ton Tank Experimental Vehicle, was very unusually armed. At that time, light tanks, as a rule, had a one-man turret, in which either a machine gun or a small-caliber gun was mounted. The new English tank had two turrets, and both of them were equipped with Vickers heavy machine guns.

Such a scheme of weapons clearly spoke about the purpose of the machine. As conceived by Vickers engineers, the new light tank was created as a "trenches cleaner". Due to the presence of two towers, he could fire at the same time in two directions. In addition, if necessary, both towers could concentrate fire on one point either in front or behind the tank. With a combat weight of 6 tons and a crew of 3, the new light tank had the same armor and speed as the Vickers Medium Tank Mk.II.


As you can see, the name "Vickers-Armstrongs 6 ton tank" was used quite officially

In addition to the tank, an artillery tractor was created at the same time on its basis. The “recipe” for its manufacture turned out to be extremely simple: the turret box with the turret was removed from the tank, a shield with a viewing window was installed in front, and seats were attached to the fighting compartment.

Just on the tractor, Vickers-Armstrongs engineers decided to try out a motor of their own design. The Armstrong-Siddeley engine was air-cooled. In general, it was quite an ordinary in-line "four", and the same power as the Dorman engine. But with its layout there was one significant nuance. In order to reduce the height of the engine compartment, the designers placed the engine horizontally, covering it with an oil cooler on top. As a result, the height of the engine compartment has become significantly less.

Tests carried out on an experimental tractor showed the viability of such an idea, and the creators of the car abandoned the Dorman motor. Thus, in 1929, the appearance of the new light tank was finally formed. By the same time, the chassis was slightly redone, including the suspension and tracks. The design developed by Cardin and Loyd was truly revolutionary. The caterpillar resource was 4800 km, which for that time was a truly fantastic indicator.


Vikcers Mk.E Type A in final configuration

The tank was offered to potential customers under two designations. In addition to the quite officially used Vickers-Armstrongs 6 ton tank (in the Russian version - “Vickers 6-ton”), another index was used - Vickers Mk.E. Other conspiracy theorists decipher E as "Export", but this version has nothing to do with reality. The letter E just comes next after the D, and a tank with that name - the Vickers Medium Tank Mk.D - already existed.

The basic version of the tank was the Vickers Mk.E Type A, which had two machine gun turrets. Compared to the prototype, the shape of its turrets was changed, and the machine guns received armored casings. I must say that the designation "6-ton" was only partly correct, since even the first option boldly stepped over this mark, reaching a mass of 6.6 tons.

For an additional fee, the manufacturer offered to install a radio station with an antenna behind the turrets on the tank, while the ammunition capacity of machine guns was reduced from six to four thousand rounds.


A special device for overcoming trenches, developed by the Hungarian designer Nicholas (Miklos) Straussler

It was this modification that became the first tank that brought a truly serious commercial success to Vickers-Armstrongs in the foreign market. In 1930, 15 tanks were ordered by the Soviet procurement commission, headed by the head of the Department of Mechanization and Motorization of the Red Army (UMM) Khalepsky. Each tank cost £4,200. It is unlikely that this deal pleased the Poles, who got acquainted with the Vickers Mk.E back in 1927, when it was just being designed. As a result, Poland acquired 38 of these machines.

Another Type A went to Greece, one double-turreted tank was bought by Bolivia and Portugal. Also, for the purpose of studying, one tank was acquired by the Japanese and the Americans. The sale of 58 tanks is very good, especially in the context of the global financial crisis and the British army, which is not in a hurry with new orders.


Vickers Mk.E Type B in service with the Kuomintang army

In 1930, foreign buyers were offered the next version of the tank - Vickers Mk.E Type B. The combat weight of this modification of the Vickers 6-ton exceeded 7.2 tons. Its main difference was that instead of two machine-gun turrets, the tank received one, shifted to the left of the longitudinal axis. The tower was displaced so that its crew would not interfere with the driver. In addition, thanks to this solution, the gunner's and commander's legs were not so disturbed by the transmission shaft running above the floor from the engine to the transmission.

Inside the double conical turret, the designers placed a short-barreled 47-mm Vickers QF gun. The Vickers machine gun was paired with the cannon. Despite the modest barrel length, the armor-piercing projectile of the 3-pounder gun pierced armor 25 mm thick from a distance of 500 meters. This was quite enough to confidently penetrate the armor of almost all tanks of that period, including the French Renault NC, which was also exported. In addition to armor-piercing ammunition, the 47-mm gun also included high-explosive fragmentation ammunition, which was unusual for British tank weapons of that period.


Tank of the 3rd series with a turret niche in which there was a radio station

Around the same time, potential buyers may have been offered a very specific variant known as the Vickers Mk.E Type C. It was a Type A with 37 mm anti-tank guns installed in the front and rear plates. However, since even the schemes of this machine have not been preserved, there is a suspicion that it existed only in someone's imagination. This is also supported by the fact that 37 mm cannons were not used in principle on British tanks.

Export variations

The first Vickers Mk.E Mk.B was ordered by the Greeks, who received their tank in August 1931. The Bolivians were next, ordering 2 tanks. Siam (Thailand) received 2 more tanks, the Finns and the Portuguese ordered one vehicle each.

However, it was an easy warm-up compared to what began in 1934. Vickers-Armstrongs has a major, in every sense of the word, client - China. The first 12 Vickers Mk.E Type Bs were ordered by the Chinese in March 1934. In total, they ordered 20 tanks in three series. Starting from the second series, a stern niche appeared in the tank turret, in which a radio station was installed. Another 8 tanks in the Mk.B variant were ordered by Bulgaria. In addition to this, Poland acquired 22 turrets to remake part of the previously purchased tanks of the first modification.


Vickers Mk.F on trials, 1934

Meanwhile, Vickers-Armstrongs engineers did not sit still. With all the advantages of an air-cooled engine, it had one significant disadvantage - overheating, which was a fairly common occurrence. Here the compact dimensions of the power compartment affected, which created problems for effective cooling.

A simple and at the same time radical solution to the cooling problem was the replacement of the power plant. A new engine was found rather quickly, it was a 120-horsepower Rolls-Royce Phantom II. It was unrealistic to place an in-line 6-cylinder engine with a volume of 7.67 liters in the existing power department, so the designers went for a trick. The engine was right in the fighting compartment, on the left in the direction of travel. Because of this, the tower had to be shifted to the right and as far back as possible so as not to interfere with the driver.

In addition, an air intake appeared in the upper frontal sheet of the hull, on the left side. The silencer from the aft hull migrated to the left side of the turret box.


Longitudinal section of the Vickers Mk.F. The difference in layout with the Vickers Mk.E is clearly visible

In 1934, a prototype tank, designated the Vickers Mk.F, was tested by the Belgians, for whom it was originally intended. From the idea to place a large, noisy and hot engine in the fighting compartment, customers were not delighted. In addition, the cooling of the new engine still left much to be desired, and the air intake in the front of the hull proved to be an excellent target. The Belgians abandoned the Vickers Mk.F.

However, Vickers-Armstrongs found an alternative that eventually suited them. But that's another story.


A large air intake appeared on the front of the hull

Despite such a sad outcome, the history of the Vickers Mk.F continued. The engineers liked the tank hull of this modification so much that it was decided to put it into mass production. The redesigned engine compartment made room for the stock Armstrong-Siddeley motor and improved cooling. In addition, the fighting compartment has become noticeably more spacious.


Finnish Vickers Mk.E Type B, with a Vickers Mk.F hull

It was these tanks that the British delivered to Finland. On July 20, 1936, the Finns ordered 32 Vickers Mk.E Type Bs. Often these vehicles are confused with Vickers Mk.Fs, although they were Mk.Es with Armstrong-Siddeley engines. Siam ordered 12 exactly the same tanks in 1938, but in this case only 8 vehicles reached the customer.

In service on the second try

As already mentioned, there was no place for the Vickers Mk.E in the British army weapons system. Despite this, the British military still tested a prototype tank, and at the same time a tractor based on it. The two-turreted machine-gun vehicle did not impress the military, and the price, which was half that of the Medium Tank Mk.II, did not convince them either. It was not possible to sell the Vickers Mk.E to "their" army. As in the case of the Belgians, a completely different, much lighter tank, also developed with the participation of Carden-Loyd, managed to interest the British military.


Serial sample of the artillery tractor Dragon, Medium Mk.IV

The failure to test the experienced Vickers Mk.E, meanwhile, did not mean that the vehicles based on it were completely closed off the road to English army. The tractor, tested in 1930, was proposed to be finalized. In 1932, a heavily redesigned artillery tractor appeared, designated the Vickers B12E1. Due to the displacement of the driver's seat forward, the volume of the car's interior has increased significantly. However, this car was also rejected by the military.

In the end, a heavily redesigned vehicle appeared - the Dragon, Medium Mk.IV. Instead of the Armstrong-Siddeley engine, a 90-horsepower AEC engine was installed on it. On the sides there were stacking for shells, quite a lot of alterations turned out to be in the cabin. The British Army ordered 12 of these vehicles. Serial Dragon, Medium Mk.IV differed slightly from the prototype. Their main purpose was the transportation of 60-pound (127-mm) guns.

By the way, this tractor turned out to be the only machine from the Vickers Mk.E family that actually fought in the British army. In 1940, the tractors were sent as part of the BEF (British Expeditionary Force) to France, where they remained after the evacuation in June 1940. The Germans became the owners of the tractors.

In addition, 18 Dragon, Medium Mk.IV was ordered by India and 23 by China.

Very similar to the Dragon, the Medium Mk.IV was a self-propelled anti-aircraft gun ordered by Siam. 26 vehicles armed with 40-mm Pom-Pom automatic anti-aircraft guns went there.


Vickers Mk.E Type B in 44 RTR, 1940. The machine has WD number 10677 and its serial number is V.A.E.1986

Another story is connected with Siam. As mentioned above, in 1938, an order was received from this country for 12 Vickers Mk.E Type B. 4 tanks with serial numbers V.A.E.1983-1986 never got there. In June 1940, when the BEF lost most of its equipment, including tanks, during the evacuation from France, the British military began to frantically search for any replacement vehicles. The same four Vickers Mk.E from the Siamese order caught my eye. These tanks were immediately assigned to the British Army. The vehicles, which received WD numbers 10674-10677, were included in the 44th Royal Tank Regiment.

In this part, the tanks used as training tanks served at least until 1941. Thus, Great Britain, the birthplace of the Vickers Mk.E tank, became the last country to adopt it. One of these tanks, serial number V.A.E.1985, has survived to this day and is on display at the Tank Museum in Bovington. The tank was camouflaged with a Chinese order, although it actually wore the tactical insignia of the British Army.

The Vickers Mk.E tank had a huge impact on world tank building. It became the starting point for the creation of the American Light Tank T1E4 - the progenitor of the vast majority American tanks and self-propelled guns, which appeared between 1933 and 1944. The Vickers Mk.E had about the same impact on Japanese tank building. In fact, everything Japanese tanks, developed since the early 30s, including the Type 95 Hago, are the "descendants" of the British machine. Similarly, the situation with Italian averages and even heavy tanks military period. The British pedigree of the Polish 7TP and the Soviet T-26 is so well known that they could not even be mentioned. In this light, it is surprising that, with the exception of a few pre-war light tanks, the Vickers Mk.E had practically no effect on British tank building.

To describe such an iconic tank as the Vickers Mk.E and its career, one article is clearly not enough. In addition to the influence exerted on world tank building, he also has other merits. "Vickers 6-ton" was the most fought tank of the interwar period. His combat career began in 1933 and ended in the late 1940s. The vicissitudes of the Vickers Mk.E in the armies of a number of states will be discussed in the following materials.

Sources and literature:

  • Vickers 6-ton Mark E/F vol. II, Janusz Ledwoch, Wydawnictwo Militaria 325, 2009
  • Author archive

The British Vickers main battle tank did not come into being like most others. Its creation was a private initiative of a company that hopes to create an inexpensive, simple, but modern MBT that will find its customers in other countries.

For such a task, we decided to use the maximum number of components of the Centurion and Chieftain tanks. Their use made it possible to reduce the price, reduce the risks of unsuccessful decisions and ensure new car a sufficient number of necessary components and assemblies.

Tank for export

Development began in 1960, and in 1961 India became interested in the novelty, whose wishes later slightly changed the design of the MBT.

First of all, it was necessary to reduce the weight of the machine to 38 tons and install a powerful 105 mm L7A1 gun.

After agreeing on the details of the project, an agreement was reached on the production of a new MBT for India and assistance in building a plant on its territory.

Already in 1963, the first prototype was assembled, which went to India for testing, a year later the second one appeared, which remained at the test site in England.

The delivery of the first series took place in 1965, and the plant in the Indian city of Avadi, which produces the Vickers Mk 1, started operating in 1966.

Named Vyjayanta - winner in translation, the machine was produced in the amount of 2200 units.

Later, 70 MBTs were transferred to Kuwait, where they even managed to fight, and very unsuccessfully.

Design

MBT was created according to the classical scheme, which assumed the engine compartment at the rear, the control compartment at the front and the fighting compartment between them.

Since the minimum weight was important when creating a tank, the protection turned out to be much inferior to the British Chieftain.

But the Leyland L60 diesel six-cylinder engine with 640 hp. easily coped with 38 tons, accelerating to 50 km / h, and there was enough fuel for 530 kilometers.

The Vickers Mk 1 was equipped with a planetary gearbox with 6 forward and 2 reverse steps, borrowed, like the engine, from the Chieftain.

The suspension had six rubber-coated rollers, three supporting and driving wheels at the rear with telescopic hydraulic shock absorbers and torsion bar suspension.

The hull was welded from rolled armor and had a front plate thickness of only 80 mm, side 60 mm and 20 mm at the rear.

The driver was in front on the right, and his seat could be fixed in the extended position, significantly improving visibility on the march.

For observation in battle, there was a wide-angle periscope, which was replaced in the dark with a night vision device.

On the left side were 25 shells out of a total of 44.

The triple turret had an atypical shape for its time, as it was welded, like the hull. This decision was due to the fact that the tank was adapted as much as possible for production in any customer countries, for example, those that do not have casting technology.

Only the mask of the gun was cast, the forehead of the turret itself had a thickness equal to the hull - 80 mm of armor, the sides were about 40-60 mm and the rear part was 40 mm.

The commander had his own turret with six periscopes, the main observation device and a hatch, and was located to the right of the gun along with the gunner.

The loader sat to the left of the gun and had his own hatch, consisting of two parts.

The main armament was the L7A1 gun, using sub-caliber projectiles with an initial projectile flight speed of 1470 m/s and high-explosive ones with a speed of 730 m/s.

There was also a 7.62 mm machine gun coaxial with a cannon with 500 rounds of ammunition, a 7.62 mm anti-aircraft machine gun on the roof of the turret, and another 12.7 mm machine gun, which was used both against weakly protected targets and as a sighting machine in case of damage to the rangefinder. Their total ammunition consisted of 3000 rounds.

Also, a block of 6 smoke grenade launchers was attached to each side of the tower.

Modifications

The tank received several modifications in addition to the mentioned Vijayanta.

Vickers Mk 2 was created in a single copy, its differences were two installations of Swingfire anti-tank guided missiles.

Vickers Mk 3 appeared in 1875, received a Detroit Diesel 12V-71T engine with a power of 720 hp, gun stabilization, 50 shells in the ammunition load, new system EFCS 600 fire control and Simrad LV352 laser rangefinder. Its production began in 1978, Kenya and Nigeria bought a certain amount, later the Vickers Mk3 (I) modification for India received improved suspension and transmission, and the Vickers Mk 3 (M) for Malaysia received more modern system fire control and some other changes.

The Vickers Mk 4 was developed in 1977 and named the Valiant, and in 1980 a single prototype was built. It was planned to be exported by installing a new tower called "universal tower" and protecting it with some kind of "adaptive armor".

This turret allowed the choice between 105 mm L7 English, 120 mm English L11A5, 120 mm German Rh L44 and 120 mm French GIAT CN-120 F1 guns.

Additionally, a new Centaur fire control system from the Italian company Marconi was installed.

Vickers Mk 7 is often called another modification, however, it has very little resemblance to its predecessors.

Epilogue

The only combat use of the British MBT was the defense of Kuwait in 1990 against Iraq.

About 70 Vickers Mk 1s, very obsolete at that time, were destroyed, and the few survivors ended up in Saudi Arabia where they were written off.

Although the Vickers MBT did not suit the British army, which preferred armor protection to everything else, it turned out to be a very successful tank, especially considering that the company created it on its own initiative. This fact is confirmed by the large number of produced tanks and their long service life.

Light tank "Vickers-6 tons"

This tank was developed, as already mentioned, on an initiative basis by Vickers in 1929 in machine gun and cannon versions.

The company provided for the possibility of creating a series of vehicles on its basis: an art tractor, an anti-aircraft self-propelled unit, tank destroyer with a 47-mm gun, etc.

All countries that built tanks of this type soon abandoned the two-tower layout proposed by the British, who believed that these vehicles would only hit manpower. The opinion prevailed that a light tank should also have weapons suitable for combat and with equivalent equipment. The design of the Vickers-6 tons was simple: a riveted hull and turret made of rolled armor plates; in the undercarriage, two bogies with four small-diameter rubber-coated track rollers on leaf springs; air-cooled engine with horizontally arranged cylinders, which reduced the height of the engine compartment. The tank had a dry multi-plate clutch, a manual gearbox and side clutches with band brakes. The towers for horizontal aiming had a manual drive.

The original "Vickers-6 tons" the British produced only a few dozen in 1929 - 1930.

We recommend reading

Top