What does it mean to pull an owl on a globe. Pull an owl on a globe or a few words about the investigation of a murder in Africa

Pull the owl on the globe. This expression in social networks means to do something far-fetched, to manipulate facts in order to justify the correctness of one's point of view, to try to fit the desired result into a poorly prepared fact. This is exactly what happened with the investigation into the murder of three Russian journalists in Africa in the summer of 2018, which was carried out by the Mikhail Khodorkovsky-funded Dossier project, which presented its results, in closed regime for those close to him, and then our liberal media carried it to the people: “ New Newspaper”, “Radio Liberty”, “Rain”, “The Bell” and the like

By the way, who conducted the investigation, where did the “documents” and data come from, how reliable are they and who can confirm their authenticity. None of this, of course. Just referred to "source safety". Divine, isn't it?

Let me remind you how it was. On July 31, 2018, the media reported the death of three Russian journalists in the Central African Republic. They were Okhran Dzhemal, Alexander Rastorguev and Kirill Radchenko. The film crew arrived in this African country by order of the "Center for Investigations" - the media structure of Mikhail Khodorkovsky. The purpose of the trip is to search and visualize evidence that Wagner PMC is in this state and that Yevgeny Prigozhin (as the liberals call him “Putin’s cook”) is in charge of his business projects in the CAR. The group arrived in this country without a journalistic accreditation, but with about $10,000 in cash (an astronomical amount of money for this country) and expensive filming equipment. A certain Martin was supposed to meet the journalists, who allegedly understood the nuances of the local nature and fauna and was supposed to provide the group with support in its work. The contacts of this very Martin, as the “investigators” now claim (I’ll call them that), were given to the editor-in-chief of Mishina’s charade by RIA FAN journalist Kirill Romanovsky, who had recently been in this African republic on a business trip. As you know, the RIA FAN media resource is associated with the same Yevgeny Prigozhin, and here the first question arises for the “investigators”. If you plan to remove compromising evidence (let's call a spade a spade) on Prigozhin, then what kind of idiot do you have to be to contact a journalist from his own publication with a request for help? As I understand it, this was not done by chance, but in order to later use the name of the RIA FAN journalist in the so-called. investigation as one of the evidence of Prigozhin's involvement in the murder of Dzhemal's group. Like, they asked a journalist from RIA FAN to help, and he, a radish, knocked on the boss, the boss got scared and decided to remove the film crew so that they would not dig up something compromising. And if so, then it turns out that when sending Dzhemal's group to Africa, Misha Khodorkovsky already knew what awaited them there and set the snares for his future "investigation" in advance? After all, what prevented, logically, from turning to journalists from Western publications with a similar request? Firstly, it is more reliable, and secondly, the secrecy of the trip from Prigozhin's structures would be observed. So, this is question number one for the "investigators". Move on.

Due to the postponement of the flight, Dzhemal's group arrived in the Central African Republic two days ahead of schedule. Let's say. Accordingly, the same Martin could not meet them, as he was in another part of the country, but he sent them a driver named Bienvenue, and immediately the “investigators” say that this is a former member of the CAR gendarmerie ... Well, they think so. And since when is the word "consider" evidence? I believe that the Americans have not been to the moon, well, I believe so, and I will never claim that this is true until I have PROOF. The driver could not be contacted upon arrival and the group went to the hotel by taxi. In the evening, Bienvenue arrived and met with reporters. And here again, the “investigators” make a charming conclusion - from the moment they arrived in the Central African Republic, Jemal’s group was under the supervision of a local gendarme, to whom everything was reported by the same driver Bienvenue, who, as they BELIEVE, is also a former gendarme, and there were also THREE Europeans (Russians) , and now it’s generally stunning - they were all later at the scene of the murder of Dzhemal’s group! Oh how!!! And why do we draw such enchanting conclusions? It's practically a charge of complicity in murder! And then we are told ... drum roll ... they were presented with DOCUMENTS! ... Show me soon !!! It's the bomb! Prigozhin is the organizer of the murder! ... And what do they tell us in response? Well….it’s…like….we have cell phone billings of these people and from them we figured out that they communicated with each other…and also stringers, whose names we certainly won’t name, interviewed local residents and they all testified that yes! Prigogine is to blame! Not even discussed!

And who are these stringers? Where are these interviews? Who are these locals? On what basis did you decide that the three Europeans are Russians and the phones belong to them and that they even existed in reality? Can cell phone billing data be trusted and are they real and not photoshopped?

And here we are shown a picture of cell phone billing. At first I thought that this was an official document of the mobile operator, but it turned out that it was not. Nevertheless, they continued to convince me that this was the original. Don't go to a fortune teller. You can never do something like this in Photoshop. I swear by mom!

Wait a second guys. And what should I understand from this picture, which, moreover, any god of Photoshop will make in two hours? Is she really genuine? Seriously? Those. Do you think that the driver, what is his name, Bienvenue, constantly called a man who, as you again assert, is a member of the gendarmerie and who was not far from Dzhemal's group? Those. Are you implying that Bienvenue reported to this gendarme about the movement of the group? Let's put the question this way. You just found a number, even if it was a gendarmerie officer, a real number, and then in Photoshop you made a billing printout where you inserted all the necessary numbers. What-what are you saying? That this gendarme was at retraining courses, where he was trained by Russian specialists? Yes, he could even be on the moon! Where is the evidence that this man was at all close to Dzhemal’s group, that he was at the scene of the murder, and that he coordinated his actions with the Russian “Vagenerovites”, except for this primitive picture with allegedly billing his cell phone and an interview that some then stringers, whose names you cannot name and show these very interviews and documents of local residents too? I'll make the same picture, put Misha Khodorkovsky's phone in there, and then I'll say that he coordinated the murder. Do you even understand how funny this is? Let me tell you how it was? You just took this poor driver's phone. They took the phone of a certain gendarme from social networks. Look, really from social networks!

They even took his real biography, because our specialists really train local security forces, and no one hides it, then they made a funny photoshop with these two phones, like one called the other all the time. Nu-nu. Let's go further. What other evidence do you have?

Stringers again? Yes, what is it! Well? What they're saying? That on July 30, the evening before the murder, 20 minutes before a car with Dzhemal's group drove in the direction of Dekoa at the exit from the town of Sibut, a jeep with five people drove in the same direction? Two African gendarmes and three Europeans, well, in the sense of employees of the Wagner PMC, as I understand it? Those. they went to ambush? And who said this to the stringers? The soldier who then served at the checkpoint? U-u-u-u-u. Did he say it himself? So he just took it and told them? Can you see how he says it? Can you look at him? Nizya? "For security reasons"? I understand... Didn't he say who killed Kennedy? Is there life on Mars? It's a pity ... Such a bomb would be. The money would be raised.

Where did you get the idea that the three Europeans are employees of Wagner? How? Billing again? Photoshop again? And the number is definitely registered to the Russian instructor Alexander Sotov? Not? But on who? On the fake passport of US citizen Barret Travis Hammond? And how do you know that this is the number of a Russian military specialist working in the Central African Republic? Yes, I know he works there! This is indeed open information! I ask why are you so sure that he still registered the left number on his American passport? Who said??? I don't understand, please repeat! Anonymous source??? Mmmmm. Worthy proof, now everyone will certainly believe that the Russians did it.

Yes guys. You definitely pulled an owl on a globe. Moreover, the owl was small, and the globe was huge, and in the process of pulling the owl was torn.

I think everyone knows that in fact the murder of journalists was the result of a combination of a number of actions that were unacceptable when working in one of the hottest spots on the planet. This is the lack of security, which they could well afford, and the neglect of the warning of the military at the very checkpoint, who did not want to first let the car with Jemal's group into the area controlled by the field commanders of the radical Muslim organization Seleka, and the lack of accreditation, and the light of a large amount of cash and equipment. But the dead journalists made the worst mistake when they contacted Khodorkovsky. From that moment on, they were doomed.

Dmitry Borisenko, especially for News Front

There is such a winged Russian Internet expression: "pull an owl on a globe." It means hard-to-perform actions associated with extreme juggling, manipulation, fitting reality to any semi-fantastic settings.

We can do it! - said the magicians from the Primorsky Election Commission and did the impossible. Truly a man-made miracle. Victory in the gubernatorial elections of the candidate from the Communist Party Andrey Ishchenko, a 7-8 percent gap between him and the candidate from " United Russia"Andrey Tarasenko, at the cost of mind-blowing efforts, in a few hours they turned into the leadership (one and a half percent) of Tarasenko.

"Apparently, according to the protocols, the number of votes for Tarasenko has increased"- with a disarming smile, a representative of the regional election commission told RIA Novosti. It turns out that in all the latest counted protocols, the checkmarks are only in front of the name of United Russia. Have you pulled the poor bird on a three-dimensional model of the Earth?

"The second round of gubernatorial elections in Primorye ended with a scandal. Almost all day, according to the CEC, the candidate from the Communist Party Andrei Ishchenko was in the lead. A new regional sensation was discussed in the media and social networks, and political scientists commented on the reasons and consequences of Ishchenko's victory, but after a few hours the results were changed in a strange way. In the interval from 98.77% to 99.03% of the processed protocols, the number of votes for Ishchenko decreased by 5 thousand, which is impossible in principle, and for Tarasenko it increased by 13.5 thousand, which allowed United Russia to win the elections. This change in the results provoked a storm of discussions about stuffing, falsification and rewriting of the final protocols." - notes the portal " Actual comments"(pro-Kremlin, by the way).

"The somersault that was made is impossible purely mathematically. This is the biggest fraud in Russia", - said Alexander Glebov, deputy of the Duma of the city of Vladivostok. " Judging by how the results changed, fraud with data was carried out at the stage of entering data into the GAS Vybory database. This is done in TECs, which is why the changes were so massive. Rewriting protocols at individual PECs could not have had such an impact on the situation", - says the editor-in-chief of the site" Actual comments "Mikhail Karyagin. " You wanted arguments against direct elections of heads of regions? Presented. Completely. Nothing has changed for twenty-five years. And it won't change. It is much more honest and cleaner to give powers to the heads of regional parliaments", - Alexey Chesnakov, director of the Center for Political Conjuncture, wrote in his Telegram channel. " Is Tarasenko really such a valuable cadre that it would be possible to discredit the electoral system in such a way?"- asks the political strategist Abbas Gallyamov on Facebook.

Businessman-builder Andrey Ishchenko was congratulated on his confident victory by his party boss Gennady Zyuganov, ex-governor of Primorye Yevgeny Nazdratenko, deputy of the Legislative Assembly of Primorsky Territory Yulia Tolmacheva and many others ... At 7:40 am (0.40 Moscow time) Ishchenko announced an indefinite hunger strike. " Late tonight, when 95.74% of the ballots were processed, I was in the lead by a solid margin, in the morning the magic of numbers prophesies a failure for me. Friends, votes are being stolen from us. Treacherously and impudently, the regional election committee is trying to steal our victory. I won this election! I declare an indefinite hunger strike on the square of the fighters for the power of the Soviets in Vladivostok. AT this moment The legal service of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation is preparing lawsuits to challenge the election results in Artyom, Ussuriysk, Nakhodka and Vladivostok (Sovetsky district). We have a complete evidence base for this"- he wrote. Hundreds of Ishchenko's supporters came to the administration building of the Primorsky Territory. Motorists passing along Svetlanskaya Street greet the audience with horns.

Earlier, firefighters arrived at the building of the election commission of the Sovietsky district of Vladivostok. They explained their actions with information about a fire on the third floor and the need for evacuation. Upon closer examination, it turned out that the arrival of firefighters was caused by the refusal of observers from the Communist Party to leave the site. At the same time, the police cordoned off the building of the TEC of the Ussuriysk city district. State Duma deputy Yuri Afonin and member of the Legislative Assembly Anatoly Dolgachev tried to get into it, but they were not allowed into the room because of the "broken lock".

"This is chaos not only in relation to the Primorsky Territory, it is chaos in relation to the entire country, the entire political system, and even to the leadership of the country"- says State Duma deputy, press secretary of the Communist Party Alexander Yushchenko. He told Interfax about the massive fraud in Ussuriysk:" For polling station 2846, we have a copy of the protocol, where 219 votes are for Ishchenko, 247 for Tarasenko, but at the moment the numbers are entered into the GAS "Vybory": 216 for Ishchenko, 1347 for Tarasenko. The chairman of precinct 2866 escaped, took all the documents with him. We were not given a copy of the protocol, our members of the election commission are blocked in one room, they cannot move; they called for an additional squad of police officers, but no one came". Deputy Chairman of the Primorye Legislative Assembly Committee on Regional Policy and Legality Artyom Samsonov told the portal dvnovosti.ru that the results of 22 PECs in the Ussuriysk urban district were falsified. According to him, the results for 10 of these polling stations were changed after the introduction of the protocols into the Vybory GAS system.

United Russia responded by accusing the Communist Party of bribing voters. " It became known that at least 13,000 people were purchased in Vladivostok, 6,000 in Nakhodka, and about 5,000 in Khasan. They paid from 500 to 2 thousand rubles for a vote", - told TASS a representative of the headquarters of Andrei Tarasenko. " We have reliable information, which we are now making official use of. The fact that the headquarters of the candidate of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation spent about 40 million rubles on the recruitment of voters. There are audio and video recordings, as well as photos to confirm this.", - told reporters the first deputy secretary regional office EP Igor Khrushchev.

According to Boris Stupnitsky, chairman of the Public Chamber of the Primorsky Territory, the observers did not record any violations during the second round.

The Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation will not sum up the results of the second round of the gubernatorial elections in Primorye. " Until we carefully analyze all the complaints that will be received, we will not sum up the results.", - said the head of the Central Election Commission Ella Pamfilova to a TASS correspondent.In an interview with RIA Novosti, she admitted the possibility of canceling the results of the Primorye elections.The CEC will send specialists to Primorsky Krai to obtain additional information.

Ishchenko told journalist Taisiya Bekbulatova about Zyuganov's night call to Pamfilova. She allegedly complained that she could not influence the situation, that the regional election commission "pissed off and out of control".

I don't feel any sympathy for Mr. Ishchenko (a swindler, he scammed equity holders, an irresponsible balabol-populist, as the people of Vladivostok say). I hate democratic performances, I think that governors should be appointed federal center. But since you decide to play direct elections, play smart.

Domestic political bloc of the AP and local authorities first, they framed the President of the Russian Federation, completely failing the election campaign of the Kremlin candidate. And they set it up doubly when they organized such a clumsy and such a shameful interference in the counting of votes at the very finish line. Let's be cynical: there are plenty of ways to turn failure to your advantage without too much fuss. There are various levers, quiet, delicate methods. To slap a rolling disgrace like today's - it must be managed.

While one triangle plows like a thousand Stephen King's blacks, talking about games, I will not talk about triangles, but about ... other imaging technologies. I will be fast and merciless to details - otherwise matan, formulas and boring.

Most modern indie developers take a ready-made engine and don’t bother with screen display technologies at all. This is progress and the twenty-first century, these are plots, mechanics, interactive cinema... but the creators have little choice: 2D pictures or 3D scenes. The first option is built from pixels; the second option, I want to rhyme from voxels, but this is not about that, so the second one is built from polygons, or rather from triangles, that is, from triangles.

Voxels are three de pixels and don't have to be cubes. It's just that if they are balls, they will not evenly fill the space, or they will begin to penetrate into each other, and this is not convenient for us. Therefore, sometimes voxels are not only cubes, but also other three-dimensional figures.

There are also vector graphics for two screens. The first computers (not yet PCs) used it, but now it's SVG and Flash which is still alive in places.

All this is great, but in modern PCs (set-top boxes and other boxes) all graphics are built by special GPU accelerators (including those integrated into the CPU processor), so even two de will be drawn on top of a pair of triangles folded into a quad (square), which is stretched over the entire (and not) a screen, with a zed coordinate equal to zero or just a depth that is the same for all pixels.

The creators of soft-trenders do their best to make b-output of graphics, bypassing the pipeline of the video card. How true this turns out to be and whether the video card driver really translates their soft pixels without conversion - we are not interested. And the interesting thing is that soft-trenders do all the transformations inside the processor and display the finished image on the screen. All operations: sprite layout, geometry transformation, texturing and post-processing, lighting with various light sources, shadows, and so on, everything is done by the CPU. The finished piece of CPU memory is sent to the memory side of the video card, from where the GPU diligently displays it dot by dot on the screen.

With two dee, everything is simple - a lot of square pictures are copied onto the screen. They are square for people, but for a computer they are just a chain of consecutive bytes. For three te, we need to play the "project it" game: the displays are still flat and two-dimensional, but the scene is three-dimensional. You need to project the "shadow" of the three de object onto a flat screen, preferably using all sorts of perspective corrections... and blah blah blah, but first you need to go even deeper. Attention! If not matan, then geometry and philosophy are already close!

There is no need to explain why we need three tees on a flat screen, but somewhere in the wilds of pitch - this three tees scene is described in the form of triangles. Why a triangle? Because - this is the minimum figure with which you can cover or tile any surface. Generally any. The circle can be tiled with triangles. Yes, this will turn the circle into a polygon, but the number of dots on the display screen is still finite, so the more triangles, the rounder the circle. Plus, different profits from the geometry of triangles.

By the way, here it is appropriate to remember that any 3D scene is described as a surface. That's how we perceive the world- feel the surface: hand, sound, eye. To see what's inside an object, you first need to disassemble it and only then look at the new surfaces. There is also an x-ray, but there we see sections and complete the volume according to ... blah blah blah. In the case of pictures on the screen, it is interesting for us to “feel” the 3D surface with light. All other collision physics solids and the sound of footsteps on the carpet and tiles in the pool - this is a separate topic for individual manuscripts.

So, we touch the triangles with light rays and get some kind of picture. A little boy, having touched the book of the Mir publishing house about computer graphics, he is puzzled: why should I draw all these triangles, making some kind of transformation, when it is easier to draw ready-made objects, as in pixel art. Here is a table and a chair, here is a ball, a cylinder, a cube, draw! And the boy is right, but (!) We have limited computing resources and we just simulate all these objects, repeating the nature of light reflected from real objects. And there is a ball, and Monte Carlo on a mountain with a princess, and along the way Mario jumps on Yosha. Mathematicians have described it all. We got integrals and in some places even triple ones, but we won't do them. We will simplify.

When simplified, we got the first quake and many triangles. There was also wulfenstein and doom and hexen, but they are two-fiftieth-de. This is to be closer to the games. In fact, the opposite is true. A ray is emitted from each pixel of the screen, it collides with some kind of triangle, and if it collides, we look to see if light falls into this place. If it falls, then highlight this point. So faster and less likely to miss. There is also a texture, which, like a skin, is stretched over an object, so that it is beautiful and different materials.

To give graphics programmers control over this whole process, they came up with shaders - programs in the GPU that transform one triangle into another or just something geometric into something else geometric, or draw a pixel. Aha! This is almost what the boy asked for, only the shader program does not draw a whole table and chair, but just one point. But this is already something, because from the dots we can draw a table, and a chair, and pixel art, and even an owl on the table, and then the globe is within easy reach.

There are many processors inside the video card and they work in parallel. Let everyone do the same thing that a couple of cores of a conventional processor do in a softtrender. Better yet, let each microprocessor of the video card work on one pixel of the final image, but then let it do all the operations. So that, as in pixel art: we put a point - we see the result.

Points are good, but we have triangles there, and the more triangles, the more collisions with rays need to be counted; the fewer triangles, the less round the ball, and the owl gradually rolls up into a cylinder. If earlier it was simply considered: a beam of light collided - light, flew past - dark, now they screwed up a cool matan such as physically-accurate rendering (PBR) and efpees sank. Well, this is, maybe we can draw a chair right away?

And they drew it, but the efpees sank anyway. To be continued... or bury it if you don't need to...

“My tongue is my friend” - this is how you can paraphrase famous proverb. Because, in fact, our language, in most cases, gives us the opportunity to conduct an up-to-date and unbiased examination. Which will be devoid of any propaganda frenzy. There is no great desire to write a long article on this issue, therefore, as they say: “let's go over the top.

The mention of the toponym "Rus" in historical sources (mainly Byzantine) was initially associated directly with one city - Kyiv. And you can even say it was synonymous with its name. In one of my previous investigations, I even put forward the theory that it was directly called Rus - Samvatas, the High Castle, an impregnable rock on the path of the Turkic tribes - the main fortress of Kyiv. But this is not important, it is important that Kyiv was called Rus, and Kyiv - Rus.

But the borders of Kyiv did not end with the borders of its fortress - Rus. The borders of Kyiv stretched as far as he could "cover" them, conquer, protect, defend. Most likely, this is where the word "Edge" came from, which means in Slavic languages, as: country, homeland, fatherland, and: part, piece, segment, end of something. And most importantly: "land".

The toponym "Ukraine" is first mentioned in the Kyiv Chronicle (according to the Ipatiev list). year 1187. In the episode about the death of Prince Vladimir Glebovich of Pereyaslav, then in the Galicia-Volyn Chronicle under 1213, 1280 and 1282. In all cases, the mention of the toponym is necessarily applied exclusively to the territory of Russia - Kyiv. Toponyms Rus and Ukraine were never used in relation to Novgorod, Polotsk, and even more so Moscow. One could even say that Russia and Ukraine have become synonymous. As a rule, Ukraine began to call Russia at the time when it became part of the federation of Slavic countries - the Grand Duchy of Lithuania and Russia. References to Russia-Ukraine can be found in the documents of the Grand Duchy of the XV-XVI centuries. So, in a letter dated 1500 to the Crimean Khan Mengli-Gerai, the Grand Duke of Lithuania calls “our Ukraines”: Kyiv, Volyn and Podolsk lands. That is the Lithuanian prince, paraphrasing, calls the historical regions of Russia-Ukraine “our lands”! That is why in the privilege of 1539 for the construction of a castle in Kiev Polissya we are talking about the usefulness of building such castles "in Ukraine" - "on the ground".

In 1580, in the universal of King Stefan Batory, it is written: “To the elders, elders, sovereigns, princes, pan, knights I will become a people in Ukraine Russian: Kyiv, Volyn, Podlyashskaya, Braslavskaya lingering.” That is, Stefan Batory directly indicates that "Ukraine" is called Russia, or all the Russian possessions of the Polish crown, and not only new ones, but also old ones.

In a mournful poem from 1585 on the death of the Kyiv castellan, Prince Mikhail Vyshnevetsky, the Kiev region is called "Pridneprovskaya Ukraine" or, translating into a modern manner, "Pridneprovsky land." In 1621, Ukraine - the lands affected by the Tatars, are considered to be Kyiv, Bratslav, Volyn and Podolsk. That is the big Rus Ukraine was represented by separate lands-Ukraines: Bratslav, Kyiv, Prydniprovska, Zadniprovska and so on.

Hetman Vyhovsky demanded the concession of "the right to the whole of ancient Ukraine or Roksolania ... to the Vistula", and declared his desire to become the "Grand Duke of Ukraine", understanding "the whole of Ukraine" - "the whole Russian Land". And finally, to prove the theory that “Ukraine” is exactly “land”. After the Andrusovo truce of 1667, which divided Ukraine along the Dnieper, the term “Little Russian Ukraine” appears in everyday life, which can mean only one thing: “Little Russian land”.

Let me remind you that many countries are called "lands" or in English / German "land" and England - "Land of the Angles" and Germany - "Deutschland" - "Deutsche Land". And the word "land" itself is translated similarly to Ukraine - country, land, region, allotment, region. So if you are historically literate, then Ukraine should be called exactly "Rus Ukraine" - "Land of Rus"!

So limitless that our "well-wishers" do it every day.

Recently tape.cry gave birth to another maxim: In Belarus, Polish globes with Russian Crimea were withdrawn from sale. To this schizophrenia lekar1971 noticed that:
Firstly, thousands of such globes, on which Crimea is ours, were imported into the country. Apparently, Puten's Polish agents worked tirelessly.
Secondly, something about the seizure of globes was heard only in Mogilev.
Thirdly, the whole movement was started in Mogilev by one zmagar, whose hyperactivity syndrome worsened the day before and he ran around the city and frightened the Belpochta kioskers with terrible paper, demanding to remove the non-kosher product of Polish printing from the counter. He distributed reports of his epic victories via the Internet, thanks to which the story became famous.

Tales about the globe are still very small and primitive.

Therefore, the libels are getting wider and lumpier:

— "Russian spring"begins for health:
Belarus is not going to question and revise allied agreements with the Russian Federation.
And then it is not at all clear from what hangover he continues for the rest:
A number of statements by President Alexander Lukashenko or high-ranking Belarusian officials are often interpreted in Russia as unfriendly, if not treacherous. In this regard, there is a need to develop mechanisms to ensure the consistency of the foreign policy of the Russian Federation and the Republic of Belarus..
And then, instead of analytics, it’s just a spit:
Whether or not there is a Russian-Belarusian alliance in reality, as well as whether there is life on Mars, is an ambiguous question..
http://rusvesna.su/recent_opinions/1465571542

— "Century" just turns into a neurotic-schizophrenic when it comes to Belarus:
For some reason, the official Minsk considered that with a certain development of events, the “Russian Spring” could happen in Belarus as well..

- But most of all "pleased" "Free press".
What is one title worth?"Stiletto" in the back of Moscow.
And further, under these headings, Mr. Ishchenko's rantings on the topic "Triumphs in Kyiv: a joint Ukrainian-Belarusian air defense system will allow shooting down Russian aircraft " . Moreover, all these express rantings on the basis of the mere fact that " Sensational photos of a railway echelon (with an MZKT chassis) appeared in the Ukrainian media, which arrived in this country from Belarus without much publicity".
Firstly, no one showed any echelon, but just a photo of several platforms from somewhere.
Secondly, if "no publicity", then no "Ukrainian media" not a word would be uttered.
And thirdly, since when did the Ukrainian Ishchenko, who took refuge in Russia, begin to believe "Ukrainian media" ?

But if you overpower yourself and read the entire text, it becomes clear that Mr. Ishchenko, who hated the Ukrainian oligarchs so much, is now very willingly licking the Russian ass: "The Russian side is not averse to radically solving the problem: just take and completely buy out a controlling stake in the Minsk Wheel Tractor Plant"
But alas: "As it turned out, Moscow has been negotiating this topic with its allies for years. No result. About this in April this year Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev spoke frankly and with obvious resentment".
And therefore (and only therefore!) Mr. Ishchenko reports his (or rather, Russian-oligarchic) ​​summary: "a certain residue from such an alliance, you see, cannot but remain".

Here, Mr. Ishchenko is very modest: The Russian (and other) oligarchs have more than just a sediment. They begin to have seizures when they see that property in the Republic of Belarus does not belong to them, but to the state (people).

P.S.
And why do all these media people and experts have such a sharp aggravation now? — you ask.

And everything is very simple: on June 22-23, Minsk will host the fifth All-Belarusian People's Assembly, at which the Program of Social and Economic Development of the Republic of Belarus for 2016-2020 will be adopted

Gentlemen, media people, experts and other political lunatics know very well that

and so they suck everything they can out of their dirty fingers, only to not show the truth about us.