Paganism and fornication in the monasteries of medieval Europe. Medical cannibalism in Europe

Original taken from matveychev_oleg in Europe, which is better not to know

Western values, which some now talk about with aspiration, have a rather long cannibalistic history. Cannibalism, fornication, homosexuality, necrophilia are not modern inventions introduced through Overton window technology. All this happened in Europe just a few hundred years ago...

Fornication

Champfleury wrote about the religious life of France in the Middle Ages:

Strange entertainments took place in cathedrals and monasteries during major church holidays in the Middle Ages and the Renaissance. Not only the lower clergy takes part in merry songs and dances, especially at Easter and Christmas, but even the most important church dignitaries. The Monasterians of the men's monasteries then danced with the Monasterians of the neighboring women's monasteries, and the bishops joined in their fun. The Erfurt Chronicle even describes how one church dignitary indulged in such exercises that he died from a rush of blood to his head.

Dinner of medieval monasteries. Miniature in a 14th-century Bible (Paris National Library)

In France, until modern times (mid-17th century), pagan rituals were preserved: “There was a pagan custom, preserved among Christians, to perform “bleating” on holidays, that is, singing and dancing, because this habit of “bleating” "remained from the observance of pagan rituals. It was only in 1212 that the Paris Council forbade monastic women from organizing “crazy holidays” in this form.

Abstain from crazy holidays where the phallus is taken everywhere, and this we all the more forbid Moneterians and Monasterians

Thus, Latin monks took an active part in the Saturnalia.

King Charles VII in 1430 again prohibits these religious “crazy holidays” in which the phallus is “raised” in the cathedral of Troyes. Latin clergy took an active part in the “festivities.”

The preacher Guillaume Pepin writes about the monks of his time:

Many unreformed ministers of the cult, even those ordained into the church, used to enter unreformed women's monasteries and indulge in the most unbridled dances and orgies with the nuns - day and night. I will remain silent about the rest so as not to offend pious minds.

Champfleury continues: “On the walls of the halls of some ancient Christian churches, we are surprised to see images of human genitals, which are obsequiously displayed among the objects designated for worship. As if an echo of ancient symbolism, such pornographic sculptures in temples were carved with amazing innocence by stonemasons. These phallic memories of antiquity, found in the dark halls of the cathedrals of central France, are especially numerous in the Gironde. The Bordeaux archaeologist Léo Drouin showed me curious examples of shameless sculptures displayed in the ancient churches of his province, which he hides in the depths of his files! But such an excess of modesty deprives us of important scientific knowledge. Modern historians, by keeping silent about Christian images of genitals in some rooms of ancient churches, throw a veil over the idea of ​​​​those who would like to compare the monuments of classical antiquity with the monuments of the Middle Ages. Serious books about the cult of the phallus, with the help of serious drawings, would illuminate this subject brightly and would reveal the worldview of those who, even in the Middle Ages, could not yet get rid of pagan cults.”

Sculptures at the Town Hall (Vienna)

Homosexuality

Medieval monks were severely punished for sodomy. Very strict. By repentance.

The three most famous books of penance - the Book of Finnian, the Book of Columbanus and the Book of Cummean - contain detailed descriptions of punishment for various types of homosexual behavior. Thus, the Book of Finnian established that “those who commit intercourse from behind (i.e., anal sex is implied), if they are boys, then they repent for two years, if men - three, and if it has become a habit, then seven." Particular attention is paid to fellatio: “Those who satisfy their desires through the lips perform repentance for three years. If it becomes a habit, then seven.” Columbanus demands that “a monk who has committed the sin of Sodom must repent within ten years.” Kummean sets the punishment for sodomy at seven years of penance, for fellatio - from four to seven years. The penalties for boys vary greatly: for kissing - from six to ten posts, depending on whether the kiss was “simple” or “passionate” and whether it led to “defilement” (that is, ejaculation); from 20 to 40 days of fasting for mutual masturbation, one hundred days of fasting for intercourse “between the thighs,” and if this was repeated, then one year of fasting. “A young man who has been defiled by an elder must fast for a week; if he consented to sin, then 20 days.”

Later, the Church condemned the books of repentance for their excessive leniency towards “unnatural vices” - the main punishments were fasting and penance. For example, in England, the burning of sodomites was introduced by Edward I. However, judicial fires did not break out because of this accusation very often... From 1317 to 1789, only 73 trials took place. This figure is significantly lower than the number of executed heretics, witches, etc.

The charge of unnatural debauchery was more often used as an addition to the charge in order to emphasize the justice of the punishment. It was incriminated against Gilles de Rais, the Templars, although in the first case it was not the main accusation, and in the second it was the true motive for the execution.

Necrophilia and cannibalism

Human flesh was considered one of the best medicines. Everything went into action - from the top of the head to the toes.

For example, the English king Charles II regularly drank a tincture of human skulls. For some reason, skulls from Ireland were considered especially healing, and they were brought to the king from there.

Places of public execution were always crowded with epileptics. It was believed that the blood that spattered during decapitation would cure them of this disease.

In general, many diseases were treated with blood back then. Thus, Pope Innocent VIII regularly drank blood expressed from three boys.
Until the end of the 18th century, it was allowed to take fat from the dead - it was rubbed in for various skin diseases.

Already in the 14th century, the corpses of recently deceased people and executed criminals began to be used to prepare medicines from corpses. It happened that the executioners sold fresh blood and “human fat” directly from the scaffold. How this was done is described in the book by O. Kroll, published in 1609 in Germany:

“Take the undamaged, clean corpse of a red-haired man, 24 years old, executed not earlier than one day ago, preferably by hanging, wheeling or impalement... Keep it one day and one night under the sun and moon, then cut it into large pieces and sprinkle with myrrh powder and aloe so that it is not too bitter...”+

There was another way:

“The flesh should be kept in wine alcohol for several days, then hung in the shade and dried in the breeze. After this, you will again need wine alcohol to restore the red tint to the flesh. Since the appearance of a corpse inevitably causes nausea, it would be good to soak this mummy in olive oil for a month. The oil absorbs the microelements of the mummy, and it can also be used as a medicine, especially as an antidote to snake bites.”

Another recipe was offered by the famous pharmacist Nicolae Lefebvre in his “Complete Book of Chemistry,” published in London in 1664. First of all, he wrote, you need to cut off the muscles from the body of a healthy and young man, soak them in wine alcohol, and then hang them in a cool, dry place. If the air is very humid or it is raining, then “these muscles must be hung in a chimney and dried every day over low heat from juniper, with needles and cones, to the state of corned beef, which sailors take on long voyages.”

Gradually, the technology for making medicines from human bodies became even more sophisticated. The healers proclaimed that his healing power would increase if he used the corpse of a person who sacrificed himself.

For example, in the Arabian Peninsula, men between the ages of 70 and 80 gave their bodies to save others. They ate nothing, only drank honey and took baths from it. After a month, they themselves began to exude this honey in the form of urine and feces. After the “sweet old people” died, their bodies were placed in a stone sarcophagus filled with the same honey. After 100 years, the remains were removed. This is how they obtained a medicinal substance - “confection”, which, it was believed, could instantly cure a person of all diseases.

And in Persia, in order to prepare such a drug, a young man under 30 was needed. As compensation for his death, he was well fed and pampered in every possible way for some time. He lived like a prince, and then he was drowned in a mixture of honey, hashish and medicinal herbs, his body was sealed in a coffin and opened only after 150 years.

This passion for eating mummies first led to the fact that in Egypt, by about 1600, 95% of the tombs were plundered, and in Europe, by the end of the 17th century, cemeteries had to be guarded by armed troops.

Only in the middle of the 18th century in Europe did one state after another begin to pass laws either significantly limiting the eating of the flesh of corpses, or completely prohibiting it. Mass cannibalism on the continent finally stopped only towards the end of the first third of the 19th century, although in some distant corners of Europe it was practiced until the end of this century - in Ireland and Sicily it was not forbidden to eat a dead child before his baptism.

According to one version, the numerous remains in the Ossuaries - bone depositories - are a by-product of these manipulations - hundreds of thousands of bones look boiled, like museum exhibits - without the remains of flesh. The question is - where did the rest of the flesh go from so many corpses?

Paris catacombs with the remains of about 6 million people. The date of construction of this wall is visible.

Santa Maria della Concezione dei Cappuccini is a Capuchin church on Via Veneto in Rome, with the remains of approximately 4 thousand people.

Czech Republic. Kutna Hora. Ossuary in Sedlec. About 40,000 human skeletons were used to decorate the chapel. The chapel acquired its present appearance in 1870.

Numerous ossuary graves located among residential areas were a characteristic feature of the city during the late Middle Ages. According to the official version, ossuaries are used for mass burials of those killed in major battles, during the plague and other disasters; according to the unofficial version, they are the results of a global cataclysm of the recent past. Regardless of the reason, the nature of the polished-boiled bones raises many questions.

More information about ossuaries here:

To be fair, it should be noted that in the 20th century, echoes of that practice persisted - the production of medicines using human flesh; similar research was carried out in the USSR.

The dissertation of A.M. Khudaz, completed in 1951 at the Azerbaijan Medical Institute, is devoted to the external use of a drug obtained from human corpses - cadaverol (kada - means corpse) for burns. The drug was prepared from internal fat, melting it in a water bath. Its use for burns allowed, according to the author, to reduce the treatment period by almost half. For the first time, human fat under the name “humanol” was used for medicinal purposes in surgical practice by the doctor Godlender in 1909. In the USSR, it was also used by L.D. Kortavov in 1938.

The substance obtained after prolonged boiling of dead bodies may well be healing. Of course, this is just a hypothesis for now. But at one of the scientific and practical seminars, specialists from N. Makarov’s research laboratory showed the MOS (mineral-organic substrate) they had artificially obtained. Research protocols showed that MOS is capable of increasing people’s performance, shortening the period of rehabilitation after radiation damage, and increasing male potency.

Consumption of human flesh in modern society

Today, in the 21st century, Western civilization legally consumes human flesh - this is the placenta and food additives. Moreover, the fashion for eating placenta is growing year by year, and in many Western maternity hospitals there is even a procedure for its use - either give it to the mother in labor, or hand it over to laboratories that produce hormonal drugs based on it.

At first, old millionaires were treated with cow and sheep embryos, and soon doctors developed an incomparably more effective medicine - alphafetaprotein, made from human unborn children.
It is produced from embryonic tissues, directly from the human embryo, from umbilical cord blood, from the placenta.

Of course, to produce this “medicine for millionaires,” thousands, tens of thousands of embryos are needed, and their age should not be lower or higher than 16-20 weeks, when the future organism is already fully formed.

Video about alphafetaprotein:

Human meat is also added to modern food products as food additives. The consumer does not even realize that when buying Nescafe instant coffee, Nesquick cocoa, Maggie seasoning, baby food or other branded products, he receives a product with the addition of “human flesh”.

American biotechnology company Senomyx Co Ltd, whose main profile is the production of various nutritional supplements for the food and cosmetics industries. If we go to the English-language Wikipedia website, we will find out that the developed HEK293 component is the pride of the above-mentioned company.

In turn, if we ask ourselves what HEK293 means, Wikipedia will also give us the answer that HEK stands for Human Embryonic Kidney, that is, the kidneys of an aborted human embryo.

The monastery is a reserve of “fornication”

Tibet was (and still is) a church state. The custom of giving younger brothers in the family as monks strengthened contacts between secular and ecclesiastical authorities... The role of the church in the life of the country can be illustrated by the following figures. According to the census of 1663, there were 1,800 monasteries in Tibet with 100 thousand monks and nuns. In 1885, there were 1026 monasteries of the Gelugpa sect alone and 491,242 monks in them, and in total in Tibet at the end of the 19th century there were 2,500 monasteries with 760 thousand monks and nuns, which amounted to one fifth of the total population of the country. At the beginning of the 20th century. the population of Lhasa was 40 thousand people, and in three large neighboring monasteries - Galdan, Sera and Drepung - at the same time there were 20 thousand monks. . The monasteries were exempt from taxes, controlled vast lands with a large number of peasants and exercised some power functions in their possessions, for example, they had the right of court. [Kychanov. Savitsky. Decree. op. pp. 141-142]. What are the specific features of Tibetan monasteries that are so admired by the modern European intelligentsia and the stories about which fascinate young people? First: “Inside the monastery there was no equality of property between the monks. They came from families of different status, and in addition, the monks had their own property, could engage in trade and had personal income from performing any rituals from believers. Poor monks worked as servants to rich colleagues." [Kychanov. Savitsky. Decree. op. P. 142]. The French researcher Alexandra David-Neel, who lived in this country for many years, made a great contribution to the study of Tibet. Here is what she writes: “In large monasteries, several thousand monks gather. The motley, ragged, foul-smelling crowd makes a bizarre contrast with the luxury and pomp of the highest clergy: they are in golden brocade vestments, and the chong chen shalngo - the abbot, the elected ruler of the gompa - in a jeweled cape and with the same staff... The cups of the richest monks too made of wood, but others - from special types of wood: they are cut from a valuable growth on the trunk of certain trees; such a bowl might cost about six pounds sterling in local currency.” [David-Neel A. Magic and mystery of Tibet. M.: Tsentrpoligraf, 2004. S. 102, 104]. Of course, stratification of property sometimes took place in Christian monasteries. But there it, firstly, did not reach such a glaring contrast, and secondly, it was the result of abuses that were not part of the doctrine. According to the teachings of Tantrism, a sharp stratification of property even among monks is a norm that must be recognized. The second feature of Tibetan monasteries is the illiteracy or even complete lack of education of its monks. Unlike European monasteries, Tibetan monks had to pay for their studies (!). Basically, “lacking the means to study for long, the poor monks usually did not receive a good education and remained semi-literate, and some illiterate. Science was not cheap, even the Tibetan poet Milarepa said: “It is impossible to do without gifts, without property you cannot know religion.” . “Boys who are in great need become gayog (servants - approx. A.O.), that is, they receive lessons for their work as servants, and sometimes food and clothing in the house of some monk. Needless to say, in this case, lessons are held, as a rule, rarely and are not too long! The teacher, himself often illiterate or semi-literate, is only able to teach them to memorize incomprehensible passages from liturgical chants, and even those in a highly distorted form. Most gayyogas do not study at all - not because it is hard for them to work as servants, but because of neglect.” [David-Neel. Decree. op. P. 109]. Such laxity in the education of most monks is encouraged by the abbot. For uneducated novices are much easier to control. And the darker the person, the less developed his brain, the easier it is for evil forces to conquer him. The third feature of Tibetan monasteries is their militarization. Medieval European monasteries were also fortresses; monks sometimes had to take up arms. But there was never any training in military craft or the formation of special monastic military detachments there. As for the Crusaders, Teutons, and Templars, these were semi-monastic formations. “In large monasteries there were militarized detachments of monks - dobdobs, who carried out guard duty, ensured order on holidays, for example, Monlama in Lhasa, carried out sentences associated with corporal punishment, etc. Dobdobs wore a special uniform and styled their hair in a hairstyle that looks like ram’s horns twisted behind the ears.” [Kychanov. Savitsky. Decree. op. P. 142]. There were special martial arts schools at the monasteries, where they taught the science of killing in various ways. Moreover, this study was an integral part of religious practices. The fourth feature of Tibetan monasteries was the indescribable debauchery reigning within their walls. This is what the Tibetan poet Milarepa (1040-1123), already quoted above, writes about this, who, by the way, was a follower of one of the mystical schools of Tibetan Buddhism. “Nowadays, lamas kill animals and eat their meat and blood without feeling the slightest shame.” . Several centuries later, in the 16th century, the poet Dugpa Kunleg writes about the same problem: “Where meditation is taught, every monk has a woman and is in an illicit relationship with her... in the faculty of logic, every monk has a boy as a friend for consolation.” . “Travelers note that the monks constantly had relationships with women outside the monastery, and homosexuality flourished in the monasteries themselves. In the list of sexual relationships considered the most reprehensible among the Tibetans, the relationship between a teacher and a student is indicated.” [Kychanov. Savitsky. Decree. op. pp. 142-143]. “Llamas lead extremely depraved lives. However, according to the general belief, all these sins will be forgiven by God just because they are happening in the holy city (!).” [Zelenin A.V. Travels of N.M. Przhevalsky. St. Petersburg: I-e P. P. Soikina, 1900. T. 2. P. 116]. Let us note that both the Tibetans themselves and travelers talk about widespread debauchery in the monasteries. Moreover, all this happened with the complete connivance of the Dalai Lama himself. We do not observe anything similar in the same European monasteries, in some of which terrible sins also flourished, but this was, firstly, not in all monasteries, and secondly, if the crime was discovered, they were punished, and even more so , were not sanctified by religion. In tantric Buddhism, where orgies occupied and still occupy a prominent place in the service, debauchery, as in pagan religions, was (and is) the norm. Which, however, for the time being they are trying to hide from naive European intellectuals. The fifth feature of Tibetan monasteries are special unprecedented psychic exercises and spiritualistic sessions, during which monks come into contact with evil forces, demons. It is almost impossible to leave the monastery. And those who tell the truth about the rituals and customs taking place there face death. With the help of the monastery system, the Dalai Lamas managed to convert half of the entire population of Tibet into monks, thus making them directly dependent on themselves. The rigid monastic way of life made it possible to control a person’s life, giving him, on the one hand, complete freedom in commercial enterprises and in satisfying lust, and on the other, making him ignorant, superstitious, dooming him to perform occult rituals, after which the human mind became clouded and the person became a toy in the hands of their masters. In fact, the whole of Tibet is a large closed monastery-concentration camp, where human degradation has been systematically carried out for centuries. And these rituals are truly terrifying.

From the book "Lost Kingdoms" by Alexey Oparin

1) forces novices into prostitution (“supplies them to “cool” businessmen, charging from 1.5 thousand dollars for a “night of love”). The text read: “There are rumors that he supplies them to “cool businessmen,” charging $1 for a “night of love.”

After a long break, the Pskov City Court resumed consideration of the claim of Tatyana Belyaeva (Abbess Elisaveta) and the diocesan Spaso-Elizarovsky Convent for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation after the publication in the newspaper “Pskov Frontier” of the article “The Hornet’s Nest” under the golden domes “in No. 3 from January 14-20, 2008. The court hearing, chaired by Judge A. Efremov, took place on March 12, 2009. The defendants in the case were the newspaper “Pskovsky Rubezh” and journalist Oleg Dementyev, the author of an article reporting on the unworthy actions of the abbess of the convent, Abbess Elisaveta, who acquired lands and houses from local residents, even using intimidation (“This place is terrible, your children will go blind “). Simply put, the abbess forced local residents to transfer houses and land plots to her free of charge, and some of the most cheerful nuns and novices drank wine, indulged their flesh and, taking advantage of the abbess’s “leniency,” from time to time became pregnant.

Thus, a novice of the Spaso-Elizarovsky convent under the pseudonym Mary Magdalene openly walked with workers who wanted to have fun and became pregnant by a young guy brought to the monastery by his mother so that he would become imbued with faith in God. In a similar way, nun Marina D. unwittingly contributed to the solution of the demographic problem. Mother Abbess Elena and Tatiana M., who worked at the monastery from the beginning of its restoration, could not stand such a “holy life” and abandoned their abbess. The first got married and left for St. Petersburg, and the second is saved among the nuns living in Sergiev Posad. Novice Elena R. also had to flee to Kazan, not wanting to remain in an atmosphere of debauchery.

Let us recall that in previous court hearings, the plaintiff’s representative failed to provide the court with evidence that the facts described in the article were unfounded and unreliable. The Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated February 24, 2005 No. 3 emphasizes that “in the absence of at least one of the specified circumstances, the claim cannot be satisfied by the court.” However, in the Pskov region, Themis apparently lives by the “local Charter.” Back on June 27, 2008, judge of the Pskov City Court I. Adaev in his Determination established: “Indeed, paragraph 7 of Article 152 of the Civil Code of the Russian Federation provides for the possibility of protecting the business reputation of legal entities according to the rules of paragraph 5 of the said article. Meanwhile, this norm does not contain a direct indication of the method of protecting the business reputation of legal entities.<…>These claims should be considered according to the rules of claim proceedings, as cases in disputes about the protection of subjective rights. In this case, the legal entity is obliged to prove the fact of causing non-material damage in the general manner established by civil proceedings, and to provide relevant evidence that is missing both in the statement of claim and in the documents attached to it.<…> “. And further:

“Guided by articles 136, 225 of the Code of Civil Procedure of the Russian Federation, the judge

O P R E D E L I L:

The statement of claim of Tatyana Ivanovna Belyaeva and the Diocesan Spaso-Elizarovsky Convent of the Pskov Diocese of the Russian Orthodox Church against the editors of the newspaper “Pskov Frontier” and Oleg Vladimirovich Dementyev for the protection of honor, dignity and business reputation shall be left without movement.

Invite the plaintiffs, before July 10, 2008, to correct the shortcomings of the statement of claim listed in this determination.

Make it clear that if the judge’s instructions are not followed, the application will be considered not filed and returned to the applicants.”

However, from the representative of the plaintiff, Yu. Karyaki, a private complaint was received by the judicial panel of the Pskov Regional Court, which was considered, as a result of which a Determination was issued with the following arguments: “According to paragraph 9 of the resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation dated February 24, 2005 No. 3 “On judicial practice in cases of protecting the honor and dignity of citizens, as well as the business reputation of citizens and legal entities” plaintiff obliged to prove the fact of dissemination of information by the person against whom the claim is brought, as well as the defamatory nature of this information. In this case, the plaintiffs in the application indicated who, when and how disseminated information that, in their opinion, does not correspond to reality and discredits honor, dignity and business reputation...

Therefore, there are no grounds for leaving the plaintiffs’ application without progress.”

Without taking into account the different interpretations of words prove And indicate The panel of the Pskov Regional Court, consisting of G. Elchaninova, V. Igoshin and O. Enislavskaya, issued a ruling to cancel the ruling of judge I. Adaev and the case was transferred to judge A. Efremov. And special control over the progress of the proceedings was carried out by the ex-governor of the Pskov region M. Kuznetsov and his former deputy A. Morozov, with whom representatives of the plaintiffs constantly consulted.

The current consideration of the claim was very stormy. It is curious that the representatives of the plaintiffs never resorted to the materials of the linguistic examination of the correspondence “The Hornet’s Nest under the Golden Domes,” which they themselves ordered. The fact is that the research and conclusion of the candidate of philological sciences, associate professor of the Pskov State Pedagogical University L. Popkova left them no chance to prove the undermining of honor, dignity and business reputation. In particular, the plaintiffs raised the following questions:

1) forces novices into prostitution (“supplies them to “cool” businessmen, charging from 1.5 thousand dollars for a “night of love”). The text read: “There are rumors that he supplies them to “cool businessmen,” charging from 1.5 thousand dollars for a “night of love.” Almost everything goes into the “income” of the monastery, but the sisters get a meager amount.”

The expert writes: “The above statements are not a statement by the author about real-life facts, since the first part of the complex sentence - There are rumors - contains a reference to an unknown source from which unreliable information was gleaned.

Wed: “Hearing.” 3. Rumor, news about someone. (usually not yet confirmed by anything) “. (SOS: 732).

2) illegally constructs residential buildings worth 200 thousand dollars and “a large house worth 700 thousand dollars or a million” on the territory of a monastery of houses.

» They are already building villas, although the abbess herself shouted that without her knowledge and without the Ministry of Culture it was impossible to dig or build anything, since the cultural layer would be disturbed. And here a residence is being built that costs at least 200 thousand dollars. Not far away there is an even larger house costing perhaps 700 thousand or a million dollars. I understand construction and know the prices. The wall around the monastery costs an enormous amount of money! Given the current difficult situation of believers, this is probably a feast on bones (Victor Kalinichenko).

Expert:<…> The text fragment used to comment on the question posed, in the context of the article, is intended to reveal social relations on the basis of rich-poor in a moral sense. There is no talk either explicitly (explicitly) or implicitly (hiddenly, at the level of subtext) of illegal construction carried out by Mother Elizabeth.”

Similar conclusions were made by the expert on all other questions raised, although it is clear that this was not what the customers were counting on. Moreover, when the testimony of witnesses from the village of Elizarovo, Pskov region, was heard in court, everything became completely clear. Resident V. Nikitin fully confirmed his words and added that his cousin once caught a young guy who was picking poppy straws in his garden in order to then smoke and “get high.” When the guy was pressed, he began to say that his father was a deputy of the State Duma of the Russian Federation and sent him to a monastery for treatment for drug addiction, paying him 5 thousand dollars a month. There were quite a few similar guys in the monastery, although Abbess Elizabeth stubbornly kept silent about it.

Participants were promised to be notified of the date for the next hearing of the resumed trial in the coming days. However, the defendants insisted and continue to stand their ground, sending petitions to the court demanding that Tatyana Belyaeva herself appear at the court hearing. They want to hear with their own ears from the abbess what the violation of her “honor, dignity and business reputation” was.

By the way, if we talk about business reputation, there is one interesting nuance here, well illustrated in one of the special encyclopedias:

“They started talking a lot and often about the image of businessmen and about creating a corresponding reputation. The tone of the discussions is set by various consultants, PR people and other members of the business community who have smelled the unique smell of the money supply. Politics and show business are already covered - with the image of the former and the reputation of the latter - everything is fine. (...) The only catch is to first determine where the image of a businessman ends and his reputation begins. And then convince the businessman himself (if he has not yet realized) that he needs these things like air. (...) It is interesting that recently the word “reputation” is very often replaced by the concept “image”. Experts believe that image is a company’s product, which it works on, develops, creating its own image, which it likes itself and the general public. And reputation is the public’s response to some actions of the company. Why such a substitution is taking place is quite clear: creating an image is a completely understandable action. A lot of experience has been accumulated in this area. It is known how to work on this problem. Moreover, the businessmen themselves know.”

Based on this classification, the Spaso-Elizarovsky Convent of the Russian Orthodox Church MP, which has its own unique image, among the people there is a well-defined reputation. And if it can be difficult for secular people to understand the image, then with a reputation, according to the logic “you can’t hide an sew in a bag,” everything looks much more definite. So a paradox arises in which the Orthodox completely refuse to perform prayers, christenings, weddings and funeral services for the deceased in the Church of the Three Hierarchs of the Spaso-Elizarovsky women's monastery, which has such a high image in the Russian Orthodox Church MP. By the way, the elder from Fr. Zalita, Fr. Nikolai (Guryanov), who had the gift of providence, during one of Abbess Elisabeth’s visits to him, he abruptly removed the abbess’s cross from her and said: “You will not be an abbess, you will not be an abbess, but Spaso-Elizarovsky the monastery will become a monastery again!“.

Fornication

Babies born

Monasteries in Mexico

Cut off from the world

Visitors

Hunger